Councilors contest Chairwoman Clemence’s call for contractual counsel consultation

Town Manager pact to be discussed with labor attorney

By Kaitlin Servant
Citizen Chronicle Writer

SOUTHBRIDGE — A vote to authorize Town Council leadership to seek legal counsel relative to the town manager’s contract resulted in flared tempers, departures, and a 5-0 affirmative vote.

In a roughly two hour meeting, which started fifteen minutes late due to a previous Council of the Whole meeting that ran long, the Town Council went through 31 agenda items in a routine manner. The items consisted primarily of subcommittee summaries, minor budget transfers and appointments. Most were passed unanimously by the eight councilors in attendance until they reached agenda item No. 29: “Vote to authorize the Town Council Chair and Vice Chair to seek legal Counsel from our labor attorney regarding the Council’s and the Town Manager’s contractual obligations including liability and personal exposure.”

Council Chairwoman Denise Clemence asserted consultation with legal counsel was needed as the town was in uncharted territory by being in the fourth year of the Town Manager’s three-year contract.

“The contract does not specify, nor has any previous contract specified this sort of thing,” she said.

Councilor Clemence went on to say that she and Council Vice Chairman Gus Steeves were willing to travel to meet legal counsel, theoretically a cost savings in not requiring lawyers to charge for their travel time.

“Is there there anything we should be doing or not doing as we move forward getting closer to that anniversary date? That is pretty much what this is. We are looking for a sense of direction,” Councilor Clemence insisted.

She claimed numerous councilors have independently approached her with concerns and questions about Town Manager Ron San Angelo’s contract situation.

Councilor Esteban Carrasco, Jr., expressed concerns with the agenda item being vague, while asserting the contract was very clear and didn’t require legal counsel. He went on to say that if counsel was obtained it should be for all councilors.

“I think we should all get that advice, not just two people,” Councilor Carrasco said. “I’ve always had a problem with that from the get go. I mentioned it last time. It’s going to cost the same amount of money for the lawyer to sit with you guys that it would cost to sit with all of us.”

Councilor Kristen Auclair echoed Councilor Carrasco’s sentiments and suggested that legal advice be given in executive session. As she was speaking, Councilor Clemence interrupted her, insisting she was going off topic. Councilor Auclair disagreed and attempted to continue, but was interrupted again before the Chairwoman ruled her out of order. Councilor Auclair attempted to appeal but that request was not acknowledged and she abruptly left the meeting.

Councilor Rick Nash also expressed his opinion that the agenda item was not framed properly and noted it wasn’t clear exactly what Town Council leadership would be asking counsel. He noted that Councilor Auclair “was 100 percent right,” and then gathered his meeting materials and left the meeting.

As the debate continued, Councilor Clemence noted Mr. San Angelo had been named a finalist for a similar position in another town. Councilor Carrasco expressed frustration with the comment.

“Why would you throw out his business like that?” Councilor Carrasco asked. He would leave the meeting similar to Councilors Auclair and Nash. Mr. San Angelo did not weigh in on the matter during the meeting.

After further discussion, the item was put to a vote and was passed unanimously by the five remaining councilors. Councilor Clemence said she would inform the Town Council of the results of the impending meeting with legal counsel.


4 thoughts on “Councilors contest Chairwoman Clemence’s call for contractual counsel consultation

  1. Does clemence get legal opinions for contracts for teacher, firefighters, police officers when Union contracts have gone over their three year limit? I don’t think so and that has never been done in the past. She apparently has her own agenda which is quite obvious and extremely nasty. Since her three year term is almost up is she going to try and stay on the council and just say I got a legal opinion due to past practice? Maybe after the election in June we can once again have a thoughtful, honest and trustworthy council. Until that time occurs we have ten more weeks of ” Monday night bashing” .

  2. How can she claim this is unprecedented territory? She obviously does not understand the role that she is in. The charter states all councilors be present when re-negotiating the Town Manager’s contract and that means, Holding executive session with all councilors present and with legal counsel present. She should be removed solely on the basis that she has no idea how to do the job she was voted to do.

  3. It is clear that Councilor Clemence wants Southbridge’s former Town Manager , Mr. Clark, to return as our Town Manger. Mr. Clark left Southbridge for Town Manager position on the Cape. He’s currently out of that position. Mr. Clark accomplished very little for our town except appear for picture opportunities. Mr. SanAngelo is the best Town Manager we’ve had in the last 20 years. He is proactive and very approachable. He places great importance in getting to know our town. He has taken the time to visit our businesses and resident living situations. Knock off the nonsense and renegotiate a new contract. If legal counsel is sought, then all councilors should be present.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.